|
|
 The
Page was last edited
11 June 2003
Contents Soundings:14
Contact
Editor of News Sheet
Join
SACH online
Subscribe
to the Journal online
|
SACH
Soundings
No 14: June 2003
Page
6
Chaplaincy Standards and Backdoor
Euthanasia
In May 2003 the Association of Hospice and Palliative Care Chaplains (AHPCC)
met at the Hayes Conference Centre in Swanwick for their annual 3 day
conference which this year focused on Ethical Issues at the End of Life.
The main conference sessions were by Alastair Campbell and David Cook, both
gifted speakers and well experienced in the complex field of medical ethics.
The sessions were inspiring. It was disappointing that Professor Baroness
Finlay of Llandaff (a ‘peoples peer’) was unable to be present due to a
House of Lord’s commitment, however her influence had a profound impact on
the conference by raising our awareness of the Patient (assisted dying)
Bill, to be presented in the house of Lord’s on 6th June. None of the
delegates had heard of the Bill. Baroness Finlay noted that no objections
had been received in the House of Lords, and suggested that given the
significant experience of hospice chaplains and the depth of understanding
we would have of the issues we might consider a response.
At first reading the Bill seemed thought through and practical, especially
when you focused your mind on the recent experiences of Motor Neuron Disease
patients going to a Switzerland to end their lives. However, on closer
reading serious questions needed to be asked and explored.
In addition to their topics of Virtue Ethics and How People Make Hard
Decisions, Alastair and David both led us through an exploration of
Euthanasia and the main arguments for and against, the arguments around
sanctity of life, the slippery slope and the experience of the abortion
legislation.
There was a general feeling that the Patient (assisted dying) Bill had
serious flaws and that the conference should prepare a response and press
statement based on our wide experience of caring for patient, the families
and staff.
The main concerns were that the Bill was based on a few difficult and well
publicised cases rather broader principles. The main criteria centred around
‘unbearable suffering’ which was ill-defined and was the sole responsibility
of the doctor to judge. What if the root of the suffering was psychological
or spiritual, why the doctor and not a multidisciplinary team to decide?
There was a concern too that it significantly changed the relationship of
the doctor to the patient and the rest of the care team. Even the doctors
‘conscience clause’ was compromised since the doctor was required to refer
on to another doctor who would carry out assisted dying. It was felt that
the bill placed too much pressure on patients who could be made to feel it
was the right thing to do for their family, and there was a strong feeling
that the experience and provision of palliative care was a significant
alternative and brought a wealth of experience in this difficult area.
The conference was careful not to use the arguments of Sanctity of Life or
the experience of the Abortion Act in its statement. Although both are
relevant arguments it was felt they would be seized by the media and would
polarise the discussion and overshadow the more important comments and
criticisms being made.
The other significant feature of the conference was the launch of the
associations Standards for Hospice and Palliative Care Chaplaincy. There are
7 standards: access to chaplaincy service, spiritual & religious care,
multidisciplinary team working, staff support, education & training,
resources, and chaplaincy to the unit (institution). The standards also come
complete with a comprehensive audit tool and suggestions for different types
of audit.
The Scottish influence on the standards is strong and was warmly if not
enviously welcomed by the conference. The standards include the relevant
chaplaincy and spiritual care components of the now mandatory NHS Quality
Improvement Scotland(QIS) Specialist Palliative Care Standards, which all
hospices have to meet, and also draw on the Spiritual Care in the NHS
Guidelines (NHS HDL 2002 76) and definitions.
The standards were piloted in 12 hospices prior to being published and were
unanimously adopted and launched on 20th May 2003. All UK hospices will
receive a copy of the standards, and all chaplains who are members of the
AHPCC. Copies are available from the secretary of the Scottish branch of the
association:
Rev Tom Gordon, E-mail
tom.gordon@mariecurie.org.uk
Aside from these two significant elements of the conference it was good to
meet colleagues from throughout the UK and to see how hospice and palliative
care chaplaincy is developing. It was also encouraging to realise how far
ahead of the field Scotland is in terms of the development of chaplaincy and
spiritual care. Small is beautiful was a phrase used to describe our
experience and offered as the main reason for the speed at which we are able
to move and agree things in Scotland.
David Mitchell
Scottish Representative
AHPCC
top
|